Remove the Windows 7 installation CD/DVD from the disc tray, type exit in Command Prompt and press Enter. Is Ventoy checking md5sums and refusing to load an iso that doesn't match or something? However, users have reported issues with Ventoy not working properly and encountering booting issues. After boot into the Ventoy main menu, pay attention to the lower left corner of the screen:
Currently there is only a Secure boot support option for check. The user has Ubuntu, Fedora and OpenSUSE ISOs which they want to load.
How to Install Windows 11 to Old PC without UEFI and TPM Expect working results in 3 months maximum. That doesn't mean that it cannot validate the booloaders that are being chainloaded. These WinPE have different user scripts inside the ISO files. Turned out archlinux-2021.06.01-x86_64 is not compatible. Do I still need to display a warning message? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. I test it in a VirtualMachine (VMWare with secure boot enabled). @ventoy I can confirm this, using the exact same iso. I didn't expect this folder to be an issue. Yes, Ventoy does work within UEFI mode and offers a default secure boot feature. Questions about Grub, UEFI,the liveCD and the installer. And of course, people expect that if they run UEFIinSecureBoot or similar software, whose goal is explicitly stated as such, it will effectively remove Secure Boot. There are many kinds of WinPE. Passware Kit Forensic , on Legacy mode booting successfully but on UEFI returns to Ventoy. I am getting the same error, and I confirmed that the iso has UEFI support. But MediCat USB is already open-source, built upon the open-source Ventoy project. Changed the extension from ".bin" to ".img" according to here & it didn't work. I have installed Ventoy on my USB and I have added some ISO's files : In Windows, Ventoy2Disk.exe will only list the device removable and in USB interface type by default. Interestingly enough, the ISO does contain the efi files as I made sure to convert the whole IMG, which on the other hand is the basis for the creation of a memtest flash drive. Any kind of solution? If the ISO is on the tested list, then clearly it is a problem with your particular equipment, so you need to give the details. I'll see if I can find some time in the next two weeks to play with your solution, but don't hold your breath. That error i have also with WinPE 10 Sergei is booting with that error ( on Skylake Processor). @pbatard Sorry, I should have explained my position clearer - I fully agree that the Secure Boot bypass Ventoy uses is not secure, and I'm not using Ventoy exactly because of it. i was test in VMWare 16 for rufus, winsetupusb, yumiits okay, https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view?usp=sharing. 1.0.84 MIPS www.ventoy.net ===>
Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: Please give the exact iso file name. Does shim still needed in this case? I see your point, this CorePlus ISO is indeed missing that EFI file. So from ventoy 1.0.09, an option for secure boot is added in Ventoy2Disk.exe/Ventoy2Disk.sh and default is disabled. Nevertheless, thanks for the explanation, it cleared up some things for me around the threat model of Secure Boot. And they can boot well when secure boot is enabled, because they use bootmgr.efi directly from Windows iso. Indeed I have erroneously downloaded memtest v4 because I just read ".iso" and went for it. By the way, since I do want to bring that message home for people who might be tempted to place a bit too much trust in TPMs, disk encryption and Secure Boot, what the NSA would most likely do, if they wanted to access your encrypted disk data on an x86 PC, is issue a secret executive order to Intel or AMD, to design special version of the CPU they need, where the serial can be altered programmatically (so that they can clone the serial from the original CPU in case the TPM checks it) and that includes additional logic and EPROM to detect and store the critical data (such as disk decryption keys) when accessed. I found that on modern systems (those not needing legacy boot) that using the GPT boot partition version (UEFI) only is a lot more reliable. Yes, at this point you have the same exact image as I have. And if you somehow let bootloaders that shouldn't be trusted through, such as unsigned ones, then it means your whole chain of trust is utterly broken, because there simply cannot even exist a special case for "USB" vs "something else". When user whitelist Venoy that means they trust Ventoy (e.g. espero les sirva, pueden usar rufus, ventoy, easy to boot, etc. Option 3: only run .efi file with valid signature. I would say that it probably makes sense to first see what LoadImage()/StarImage() let through in an SB enabled environment (provided that this is what Ventoy/GRUB uses behind the scenes, which I'm not too sure about), and then decide if it's worth/possible to let users choose to run unsigned bootloaders. This means current is 32bit UEFI mode. we have no ability to boot it unless we disable the secure boot because it is not signed. Hi, Hiren's Boot CD can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. Would disabling Secure Boot in Ventoy help? slitaz-next-180716.iso, Symantec.Ghost.Boot.CD.12.0.0.10658.x64.iso, regular-xfce-latest-x86_64.iso - 1.22 GB Hi FadeMind, the woraround for that Problem with WinPE10_8_Sergei_Strelec_x86_x64_2019.12.28_English.iso is that you must copy the SSTR to the root of yout USB drive than all apps are avalaible. It should be specially noted that, no matter USB drive or local disk, all the data will be lost after install Ventoy, please be very careful. Even debian is problematic with this laptop. Is it possible to make a UEFI bootable arch USB?
No bootfile found for UEFI! Issue #313 ventoy/Ventoy GitHub I guess this is a classic error 45, huh? Finally, click on "64-bit Download" and it will start downloading Windows 11 from Microsoft's server. It is pointless to try to enforce Secure Boot from a USB drive. Open File Explorer and head to the directory where you keep your boot images. Download non-free firmware archive. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. Have a question about this project? Would MS sign boot code which can change memory/inject user files, write sectors, etc.? Heck, in the absolute, if you have the means (And please note here that I'm not saying that any regular Joe, who doesn't already have access to the whole gammut of NSA resources, can do it), you can replace the CPU with your own custom FPGA, and it's pretty much game over, as, apart from easy to defeat matters such as serial number check, your TPM will be designed to work with anything that remotely looks like a CPU, and if you communicate with it like a CPU would, it'll happily help you access whatever data you request such as decrypted disk content. @ventoy used Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk files to disable UEFI file policy, that's the easiest way, but not a 'proper' one. Now, if Microsoft finally relinquished their abusive policy about not accepting GPLv3 code for Secure Boot signing and Ventoy was updated not to allow unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled (i.e. (I updated to the latest version of Ventoy). I assume that file-roller is not preserving boot parameters, use another iso creation tool. to your account, Hello I'm not sure whether Ventoy should try to boot Linux kernel without any verification in this case (. etc. They do not provide a legacy boot option if there is a fat partition with an /EFI folder on it. If someone has physical access to a system and that system is enabled to boot from a USB drive, then all they need to do is boot to an OS such as Ubuntu or WindowsPE or WindowsToGo from that USB drive (these OS's are all signed and so will Secure boot). BIOS Mode Both Partition Style GPT Disk . puedes usar las particiones gpt o mbr. This could be due to corrupt files or their PC being unable to support secure boot. So it is pointless for Ventoy to only boot Secure EFI files once the user has 'whitelisted' it. Now Rufus has achieved support for secure boot as now NTFS:UEFI Driver is signed for secure boot by Microsoft. . You can use these commands to format it:
XP predated thumbdrives big enough to hold a whole CD image, and indeed widespread use of USB thumb drives in general. Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. 4. Copyright Windows Report 2023. That's because, if they did want to boot non Secure Boot enabled ones, they would disable Secure Boot themselves. Which means that, if you have a TPM chip, then it certainly makes little sense to want to use its features with Secure Boot disabled. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view, https://www.mediafire.com/file/5zui8pq5p0p9zug/Windows10_SuperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso/file, [issue]: Can't boot Ventoy UEFI Native (Without CSM) on HP ProBook 640g1. for the suggestions. You are receiving this because you commented. This completely defeats Secure Boot and should not happen, as the only EFI bootloader that should be whitelisted for Secure Boot should be Ventoy itself, and any other EFI bootloader should still be required to pass Secure Boot validation. Where can I download MX21_February_x64.iso? JonnyTech's response seems the likely circumstance - however: I've ^^ maybe a lenovo / thinkpad / thinkcentre issue ? Great , I also tested it today on Kabylake , Skylake and Haswell platforms , booted quickly and well. PS: It works fine with original ventoy release (use UEFIinSecureBoot) when Secure boot is enabled. Thank you for your suggestions! 3. You can change the type or just delete the partition. Level 1. Earlier (2014-2019) official GRUB in Ubuntu and Debian allowed to boot any Linux kernel, even unsigned one, in Secure Boot mode. No bootfile found for UEFI with Ventoy, But OK witth rufus. Topics in this forum are automatically closed 6 months after creation. Ventoy is a free and open-source tool used to create bootable USB disks. Sorry for the late test. screenshots if possible If that was the case, I would most likely sign Ventoy for my SHIM (provided it doesn't let through unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled, which is the precise issue we are trying to solve) since, even if it's supposed to be a competitor of Rufus, I think it's a very nice solution and I'm always more than happy to direct people who would like to have a multiboot version of Rufus to use Ventoy instead. https://osdn.net/projects/manjaro/storage/kde/, manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso BOOT Linux distributives use Shim loader, each distro with it's own embedded certificate unique for each distro. function gennr(){var n=480678,t=new Date,e=t.getMonth()+1,r=t.getDay(),a=parseFloat("0. No. Error : @FadeMind privacy statement. For example, how to get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. orel-2.12.22-26.12.2019_13.14.livecd.iso - 1.1 GB Remain what in the install program Ventoy2Disk.exe . Happy to be proven wrong, I learned quite a bit from your messages. Yes, I finally managed to get UEFI:NTFS Secure Boot signed 2 days ago, and that's part of why there's a new release of Rufus today, that includes the signed version of UEFI:NTFS. If I am using Ventoy and I went the trouble of enrolling it for Secure Boot, I don't expect it to suddenly flag any unsigned or UEFI bootloader or bootloader with a broken signature, as bootable in a Secure Boot enabled environment. And, for any of this to work, Ventoy would still need to independently solve the problem of allowing unsigned bootloaders pass through when Secure Boot is enabled @ventoy Help !!!!!!!
Windows 7 UEFI64 Install - Easy2Boot I still don't know why it shouldn't work even if it's complex.
The Ultimate Linux USB : r/linuxmasterrace - reddit And it's possible that the UEFI specs went as far as specifying that specific aspects of the platform security, such as disk encryption through TPM, should only be available if Secure Boot is enabled. I think it's OK. You can put a file with name .ventoyignore in the specific directory. This means current is ARM64 UEFI mode. I've tried Debian itself, Kubuntu, NEON, and Proxmox, and all freeze after being selected in the Ventoy menu. It seems the original USB drive was bad after all. Adding an efi boot file to the directory does not make an iso uefi-bootable. same here on ThinkPad x13 as for @rderooy Attached Files Thumbnail (s) Find Reply Steve2926 Senior Member Does the iso boot from s VM as a virtual DVD? Tested on ASUS K40IN
[issue]: ventoy can't boot any iso on Dell Inspiron 3558, but can boot How to Download Windows 11 ISO and Perform a Clean Install | Beebom But, even as I don't actually support the idea that Secure Boot is useless if someone has physical access to the device (that was mostly Steve positing this as a means to justify that not being able to detect Secure Boot breaches on USB media isn't that big a deal), I do believe there currently still exist a bit too many ways to ensure that you can compromise a machine, if you have access to said machine. If Secure Boot is not enabled, proceed as normal. In other words it will make their system behave as if Secure Boot is disabled, which they are unlikely to expect, else they would have disabled Secure Boot altogether to boot said media (which, if they control that system they can always easily do, especially if it's in a temporary fashion to boot a specific media that they know isn't Secure Boot compliant). I don't remember exactly but it said something like it requires to install from an Installation media after the iso booted. The current release of Slax (slax-64bit-11.2.1.iso) fails to boot using UEFI64 using ventoy with the error message: In Ventoy I had enabled Secure Boot and GPT. OpenMandrivaLx.4.0-beta.20200426.7145-minimal.x86_64.iso - 400 MB, en_windows_10_business_editions_version_1909_updated_march_2020_x64_dvd_b193f738.iso | 5 GB Still having issues? About Fuzzy Screen When Booting Window/WinPE, Ventoy2Disk.exe can't enumerate my USB device. privacy statement. Are you using an grub2 External Menu (F6)? So, Fedora has shim that loads only Fedoras files. https://download.freebsd.org/releases/arm64/aarch64/ISO-IMAGES/13.1/FreeBSD-13.1-RELEASE-arm64-aarch64-disc1.iso.