Voting ends March 8, 2023. Especially for beginning astrophotographers, who should first invest most of their finances into a good telescope mount, telephoto lenses are an excellent and affordable solution. Depth of field at f/2 on the 135 is so shallow that I usually shot it stopped down to f/2.8 or f/4 anyway. Rokinon 135mm F2.0 ED Lens. It would seem to be a better use of a camera to first look for a suitable background, and then and only then to use bokeh. Second night out with mine right now and I am here in the comments looking for the part number or link! A single, 90-second exposure using the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC at F/4.
AstroBin It's sharp, has very low aberrations, no real distortion and the bokeh is very nice. Do you have a link to Yuri's photo stream? http://www.flickr.com/photos/tbrigham/284303834/. I would recommend buying it used if you want to save some money, with the added benefit that you can re-sell it at the same price as you bought it for, effectively giving you the opportunity to "rent it" for free. The clip-in Astronomik 12nm Ha is one of their most popular filters ever and for good reason! The 135 is lighter, but that's its only advantage. Rain or shine, it's hard to find a camera that does all the OM-5 can for the price. When I was on my way home after purchasing my first 135mm lens (the Samyang/Rokinon one) I took a few quick snapshots just to try out the lens. We were surprised by just how much difference there was between these AI-powered image enlargers. But I hardly used it in the 30+ years.
How to Find the Perfect Astrophotography Target with Stellarium For example, the legendary Canon 85mm F1.2L weighs in at 1025g, and the Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art isn't too light either at 1130g. The Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 includes a lens hood, lens pouch, front and rear lens caps, and a 1-year Rokinon manufacturer warranty. (Suggesting that diffraction limiting is only part of the story with lens softness at tiny apertures.). http://www.adstateagent.com | http://www.printradiant.com | http://www.hitsticker.com, I love this lens. The main problem with the old lenses is spherical aberration and colour error, especially pronounced on digital sensors. I enjoied the use of this lens many years before the DSLR. Here is a recent ones taken with the canon xs and a lens. But, since fast 300mm ED lenses are beyond my toy budget, I would appreciate seeing magnified center and corner test images of actual star fields. The Canon is about as sharp as the Samyang, but it has some very slight chromatic aberration. BTW, the 300-mm Tele-Tessar you describe -- what camera was it made for? Standards have risen in recent years. The optical design includes one extra-low dispersion (ED) lens element to control chromatic aberration, and ultra multi-coatings (UMC) to both improve light transmission and reduce flare. You currently have javascript disabled. 8MP is plenty for the usual 8x10 or 16x20 portrait print. " But first, there are several general rules which must be understood. This lens flares easily and the flare can be especially ugly if a sun or flash are in the frame. I haven't seen compassion with the excellent Zeiss lens you quote (That BTW costs at least 3.5-4 times, yet a good comparison as similar to Zeiss, Samyang believes in providing the exceptional Image Quality, with Manual focus) but compare with Canon's L 135mm F2.0, that by many reviews, is considered as one the best Canon lenses ever made (Not . I read and bought it. There is no such thing, in my opinion. Over the years, I have tried more than two dozen telephoto lenses, until I finally found three or four perfect solutions. At a local amateur soccer game using the 135 f/2 the action was almost always too close, or too far away. (purchased for $1,100), reviewed August 12th, 2009 Lagoon and Trifid wide field IC1396 nebula in Cepheus - wide field image. I think the readers would welcome contributions from other members' experiences. A Canon 70-200L IS II at 200mm at f2.8 has all the same characteristics of the Canon 135L. (purchased for $860), reviewed March 9th, 2017 The full extent of the relationship between Rokinon and Samyang is unknown to me, but the packaging on my lens says Technology by Samyang Optics. Also, we ought never question or diminish the joy of others. I have the Sony SaL 135F1.8 Zeiss Lens and think that is excellent. Perhaps this impression of unreal sharpness is strengthened by the contrast to the extremely creamy bokeh you typically get in the same photo. 2. Sharp but smooth at the same time. For some objects a reflection can take away from the photo because it covers interesting details of the object (Think Alnitak in the Horsehead Nebula). 10/10 (Editor's Choice) Check Price. (purchased for $899), reviewed December 9th, 2006 No rubber sealing against the camera body tend to give me the creeps when shooting in the wet. Love the shot of the blue anemone, which also displays nice bokeh, and blur! Thanks, Chris, hi Trevor my name is sagar i have same lens but i have one question why lot of stars are appearing in my image which is taken thru rokinon 135mm, Your email address will not be published. At around $900 US very good price for quality no IS. There is some controversy about the use of UV filters, but I found that a good UV filter significantly improves contrast, sharpens small star images, and reduces chromatic aberration. No rear seals - since the 17-40 Canon has added rear seals to L lenses, to help in weather sealing. It is the lens I use as a reference point to compare all new lens acquisitions to after purchase to determine if they need to be returned for repair or replacement. best lens, blur, sharp-super, no CA, minimal shading. But you just know that there is the professionalism that is lacking here -- and the writer's Instagram page confirms that. Include the Carl Zeiss in your research though, it might be an interesting lens for you, even if it is a bit pricey for what you get. thank you for that great review and also the explanations. I shoot dozens of weddings every year but the 135mm stayed in my bag a majority of the time; I just didn't find myself needing to use it. I agree to some extent with many of the critics of the article and disagree with much of its content, but I also have respect for the the author's right to express those opinions. I've owned nice SLR gear since 1976, and am normally a wide angle shooter this is my favorite lens, of all time. (purchased for $700), reviewed October 9th, 2012 One is the price, which starts around $800 for the smallest units, and rapidly climbs into thousands of dollars for larger apertures. Testing on an EOS-5D, we see that it's sharpness is almost as good wide open in the corners as on the EOS-20D with its smaller sensor. Try to have eyes and nose / lips all in focus. Not heavy like the white tele-zooms.
Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM Lens Review - The-Digital-Picture.com In the past, Ive covered a number of different lenses, from the Sigma 24mm F/1.4 to the Canon EF 300mm F/4L. (purchased for $900). Part of it might be that they were designed for film photography and modern digital sensor are far more demanding in terms of optical quality. My first photo of the night sky is of Comet NEOWISE, however I know its not the best photo I could capture. The RedCat is deeper at 250mm, and after that, youre into 300-400mm territory which pulls galaxies and nebulae even closer. There was no reason to test any other because, when stopped down to 49mm, F6.1, this lens is simply perfect, comparable to any APO on the market. So, let's see where it falls short of perfection: I've missed shots at wide apertures because the DOF is so extremely thin. Recently, the FAA announced that recreational drone pilots in the USA can request LAANC authorization to fly in controlled airspace at night. Particular properties of modern 135/2 lenses are resolution with e.g. As rest you do just by cropping or stitching. D8XX cameras, subject isolation and quality of bokeh.Zoom lenses can not hold a candle to such primes. Focusing should be done on moderately bright stars using the 10x magnified Live View. Thanks.. or.. Clear Skies! With todays huge variety of digital sensors, each with their own characteristics, in-camera and post-processing etc., much depends on the given combination of your photo gear to create a certain effect.
Rokinon 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC Lens (Canon EF) - B&H Photo SharpStar Askar ACL200 200-mm f/4 astrographic telephoto lens, Astrotrac 360 tracking platform first impression, FIELD TEST: CARL ZEISS APOCHROMATIC & SHARPEST (CZAS) BINOVIEWER, Deus_Ex_Mamiya and Michael Covington like this. As you know, camera lenses come in varying focal lengths, apertures, and optical quality. Whatever lens you pick in the end, you will make a great purchase. The Samyang 135mm f/2 lens is very wide in astrophotography terms. I got my first 400 around 50 years ago, and I must say that each step forward feels like a revolution, for a while. AHAB. Is this Nikon already, Astro modified, without need for H alpha filters or any further modifications? When i check a F stop chart, i see 15 stops if i count the main, and the secondary ones: 2, 2.4, 2.8, 3.3, 4, 4.8, 5.6, 6.7, 8, 9.5, 11, 13, 16, 19, 22. PRICE. 21P Giacobini Zinner NGC1499 California Barnard 8 Cr399 Coathanger North America and Pelican Veil nebula HORGB M11 cluster area
Orion's Belt : r/astrophotography - reddit.com The combination of a wide aperture and very little light lost in transmission makes very high shutter speeds possible. But that 10Mpix is more than enough to make a very good A3-A2 size print, but your technique needs to be very good as even slight misfocus is even more visible and the rendering faults as well. Really, just an amazing lens, easily worth the $800-900 it commands on the street. Images that sing.
The Rokinon 135mm F/2 was Built for Astrophotography Because it manage to do so. It is so sharp it makes you rethink the use of your zoom lenses. If you have a more appropriate portrait lens like an 85, 90 or 100, the 135 does not bring you very much. I have an old 135/2.5 Takumar that is not bad at all, for the price. It just doesn't get any better than this! It is worth of it's price?Any links to astrophotos with this lens?Thanks. I bought this lens after reading your great review for my Nikon D5300. AF ring feels loose compared to my other L lenses.
Rokinon 135mm F/2 Lens for ASTROPHOTOGRAPHY - YouTube Before I go any further, Id like to share a photo from Gabriel Millou of the Andromeda Galaxy using a Canon 1300D. I own a 135 since the film days (because you "had to have one" and could not afford much else), still have the zeiss Jena f3.5 M42 and even jumped for the zeiss f2.8 for my yashica when they were sold for next to nothing. I know taste is subjective, but it seems to me that some people have become obsessed with blur and bokeh. Thanks Gary! Now I have only the Nikon but I can try to take a photo of the same subject fully open In these situations, a portable, wide-field imaging rig wins. Now, I have to admit that up to this point, it sounds a little too good to be true. Sharpness, contrast and the natural vignetting on full-frame cameras is awesome! Chris referred to the Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM as 'a little gem'! 200mm Astrobin photos (not taken by me): https://www.astrobin.m USM F2.8 L II 85 Is a different story, my 85 gets used a lot. I've seen several listed but here are more to consider. However, stepping outside to polar align a small star tracker and attach a DSLR and lens is quick and painless. I am still very proud of some of the photos I shoot with a Pentax O450 15 years ago - a good smartphone camera today is at least as capable. KevinS, in my experience stopping down dramatically improves image quality in terms of chromatic aberration, coma and astigmatism. Great lens, but I can't understand why Canon can't control quality. To shoot indoors under typical gymnasium lighting, you often need f/2.0 or wider to get a shutter speed high enough to stop the action. Magical images, great AF, great close focusing abilities. Valerio, Electronically Assisted Astronomy (No Post-Processing), Community Forum Software by IP.BoardLicensed to: Cloudy Nights, DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging, This is not recommended for shared computers, Back to DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging, Buckeyestargazer 2022 in review and New Products. The Bokeh includes as well all that is in the focus, but mainly talked about how it comes visible in out of focus areas. As in all arts the client's likes influence the result up to a point. Click on following link to view images Well, for me. Although typically unused in astrophotography, I did get a chance to see the beautiful bokeh this lens creates when shooting at F/2. Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage. Seems to me that Michael is pretty new to using long telephoto lenses, he writes that the Samyang is the first he has owned. Add To Cart. Colour and contrast is great. Sure, that would be swellbut it doesn't matter with regard to how it performs. Test Notes its useful to keep in mind these bokeh circles are the result of light sources bright lamps from autos Christmas lights streetlamps etc and are seriously overused in articles on lenses with strong subject\ backround seperations, they approach parody in the way they characterise subject separation, for most purposes and in most portrait situations its less highlight dominant backrounds that grace a photo. It's bokeh is comparable to the 85mm 1.2 but IMO not as nice. Latter looks quite professional.. This is perhaps because I'm more of a zoom guy (I have the trio of Canon f2.8 L zoom lenses, with coverage from 16mm to 200mm), and I didn't see that big a difference between my 70-200 f2.8 and my 135 f2except I could cover a lot more with my zoom than I could with a prime. Mr Ericsson makes a very good point, and to go and dig irrelevant background info on him to discredit him is just well THAT is trolling. Although if Bokeh and sharpness is your thing and you can live with MF the Laowa 105mm f/2 Smooth Trans Focus (STF) is amazing. This lens provides all of these requirements. She's cold? Otherwise this lens is absolutely incredible. That's a cheap, fun date for AP. As you can see, the magnification of the lens used will dictate the type of projects you shoot. Touching the telescope, even ever so slightly, will introduce vibrations which will ruin the photograph. Of the old teles I've had, Nikon's 400mm f/3.5 was decent, Olympus's 300mm f/4.5 was good (it had a precursor to ED glass) Pentax's 300mm Takumar was TERRIBLE, Pentax's 500mm was terrible, Nikon's 135 f/2.8 Q was ok, and Sigma's 400mm f/5.6 "apo" was satisfactory. Can't argue with your reasoning, Juksu, about the framing of the article, but just stopping by to say I really liked that cat picture, am shopping for a new smartphone, struck that this type of photo is in another league - all newbie observations, of course, which sort of supports your thoughts that an article like this would be better framed as a "Love this new long lens stuff" sort of thing. Geometric distortion is lower than one would expect, at 0.15% pincushion maximum, with an average of 0.07%. Lens hood - when I bought this lens years ago the included hood was rather cheap (perhaps Canon has updated the hood) by comparison with other hoods. From the moment I reviewed the first sub-exposure on the display screen of my camera, I feel in love with the mid-range magnification of a 135mm lens. But I would argue that a 135mm F2 lens produces even greater bokeh, thanks to the long focal length that compresses the background far more than the 85mm lens. Because of some residual chromatic aberration even with the aperture stop, the best focus lies not where the star image is the smallest, but rather just slightly away from infinity, at the point where the star image barely begins to enlarge. Big F-value.Light. If you shoot things in motion on a Canon body, and need some reach without massive bulk, this is the one I recommend. Ive spent a handful of nights testing this lens in my Bortle Scale Class 6/7 backyard, and my results live up to the hype it gets in terms of astrophotography performance. Instead it means the style of rendering. Great reach for street shots. A lot of us have been saying this for years. Sharp, handy, strong colours and contrast. Its nice to have the F/2. Large focus ring. It is by far the fastest focusing, best bokeh, and lowest light lens you will ever find. Proper composition, light and retouching are much prefferable to crazy gooey bokeh. Or just get a zoom that is 24-200mm and you are covered. (purchased for $900), reviewed April 15th, 2011 (purchased for $800), reviewed March 15th, 2010 But for many of us, somewhere in between, are plenty of short to mid-tele lenses that will deliver solid service (in terms of subject separation) without carrying around still another kilo for the sake of more blur. Creamy smooth bokeh. EF-mount only, this packs more megapixels, a bigger sensor, and a high max ISO. It disagrees completely with the definition that you give! Target for bortle 9 astrophotography? My only complaint about this lens is that the depth of the lens shade forces me to remove the shade in order to remove or replace the lens cap (my hands are fairly large). A series of such images can be digitally stacked to produce excellent results. Sme of the wide field are. We have come to accept that most lenses are strong in only one or two of these three factors, that I personally focus on when researching lenses to buy. The Precious - sharp images, fast focus, perfect weight, reference-quality build. enlarge. Photos posted are pleasing but I'd be into seeing something new. Image quality is great, it is tack-sharp wide-open even though for partraiture, a little bit of softness is needed. At the other end of the aperture range though, the 5D's larger pixels actually help matters, as the softening starts later (it's very sharp even at f/16), and is noticeably lower at f/32. For the rest there is Sigma 135 /1.8 Art also fantastic value lens. f2, very sharp, virtually without CAs, contrast, colour, lightwight, buildings. If you want to preview the image field you can expect with a particular camera sensor and lens combination, Stellarium features a useful tool. Still, all things considered, I prize this lens very highly and can not imagine giving it up. f1.4 was a necessisty rather than a creative luxury. This is a very practical way to plan your next astrophotography project, and especially handy when using a wide field lens like the Rokinon 135mm F/2. In this review, however, I am using the lens on a crop sensor (APS-C) Canon EOS 60Da, which puts the field of view at 12.4 degrees.